Detect gibberish, garbled text, and nonsense with high precision.
A zero-dependency Python library for identifying random character sequences, keyboard mashing, encoding errors, and other forms of text corruption. Uses statistical analysis, phonotactic rules, and pattern matching to distinguish meaningful text from gibberish.
pip install pygarble
from pygarble import GarbleDetector, EnsembleDetector, Strategy
# Recommended: Use the default ensemble (99.2% precision, 85.6% recall)
detector = EnsembleDetector()
detector.predict("Hello world") # False - valid text
detector.predict("asdfghjkl") # True - keyboard mashing
detector.predict("qxzjkwp") # True - impossible letter combinations
# Get probability scores (0.0 = valid, 1.0 = gibberish)
detector.predict_proba("Hello world") # ~0.1
detector.predict_proba("xkqzjwp") # ~0.9
# Batch processing
texts = ["Hello world", "asdfghjkl", "Normal sentence here"]
results = detector.predict(texts) # [False, True, False]
Tested on 1,644 samples (dictionary words, sentences, random strings, keyboard mashing) via regression/benchmark.py:
| Detector | Precision | Recall | F1 Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| EnsembleDetector() | 99.2% | 85.6% | 91.9% |
| MARKOV_CHAIN | 99.2% | 84.3% | 91.2% |
| NGRAM_FREQUENCY | 97.6% | 75.0% | 84.8% |
| LOG_LIKELIHOOD_RATIO | 100% | 63.4% | 77.6% |
| WORD_ANOMALY | 100% | 52.8% | 69.1% |
The default ensemble is the union (voting="any") of MARKOV_CHAIN with two strategies that produced zero false positives on the benchmark (LOG_LIKELIHOOD_RATIO, WORD_ANOMALY), so each member only adds recall. It strictly dominates any single strategy.
Two useful variants:
# Strict precision: majority vote drove false positives to 0 on the
# benchmark (100% precision, 74.9% recall) at the cost of recall
detector = EnsembleDetector(
strategies=[
Strategy.MARKOV_CHAIN, Strategy.NGRAM_FREQUENCY, Strategy.WORD_LOOKUP,
Strategy.LOG_LIKELIHOOD_RATIO, Strategy.WORD_ANOMALY,
],
voting="majority",
)
# Specialist coverage: adds detection of hashes, mojibake, repeated junk,
# and homoglyph attacks that the character-model strategies don't target
detector = EnsembleDetector(
strategies=[
Strategy.LOG_LIKELIHOOD_RATIO, Strategy.WORD_ANOMALY,
Strategy.KEYBOARD_ADJACENCY, Strategy.MOJIBAKE,
Strategy.HEX_STRING, Strategy.REPETITION, Strategy.UNICODE_SCRIPT,
],
voting="any",
)
| Strategy | Description | Precision |
|---|---|---|
MARKOV_CHAIN |
Character transition probabilities trained on English | 99.2% |
NGRAM_FREQUENCY |
Common English trigram analysis | 97.6% |
LOG_LIKELIHOOD_RATIO |
English-vs-random two-model bigram comparison | 100% |
WORD_ANOMALY |
Per-word scoring; catches one garbage token in a valid sentence | 100% |
WORD_LOOKUP |
Dictionary of 49K English words | high recall |
Statistical Models (v0.7.0+)
LOG_LIKELIHOOD_RATIO - Log-likelihood ratio of English vs uniform character models (length-normalized)WORD_ANOMALY - Fraction of individually-anomalous words; robust to garbage embedded in valid textKEYBOARD_ADJACENCY - Physical key-adjacency walks (catches mash the trigram lists miss)High Precision (v0.5.0)
BIGRAM_PROBABILITY - Impossible letter pairsLETTER_POSITION - Invalid letter positionsCONSONANT_SEQUENCE - Too many consecutive consonantsVOWEL_PATTERN - Invalid vowel sequencesLETTER_FREQUENCY - Abnormal letter distributionRARE_TRIGRAM - Impossible trigramsCore Strategies
MARKOV_CHAIN - Character-level Markov chain (best overall)NGRAM_FREQUENCY - Trigram frequency analysisWORD_LOOKUP - English dictionary lookupPRONOUNCEABILITY - English phonotactic rulesKEYBOARD_PATTERN - Keyboard row sequencesENTROPY_BASED - Shannon entropy analysisVOWEL_RATIO - Vowel to consonant ratioSpecialized Detectors
MOJIBAKE - Encoding corruption (UTF-8 as Latin-1)UNICODE_SCRIPT - Homoglyph/script mixing attacksHEX_STRING - Hash strings and UUIDsSYMBOL_RATIO - Excessive symbols/numbersREPETITION - Repeated patterns (ababab, repeated words)Pattern Heuristics
PATTERN_MATCHING - Configurable regex patterns (keyboard rows, repeated/alternating chars)Removed in v0.8.0:
CHARACTER_FREQUENCY,WORD_LENGTH,STATISTICAL_ANALYSIS,COMPRESSION_RATIO, andENGLISH_WORD_VALIDATION(the only strategy requiring a third-party dependency). All were dominated by the strategies above;WORD_LOOKUPreplacesENGLISH_WORD_VALIDATIONdependency-free.
from pygarble import GarbleDetector, Strategy
# Markov chain - best overall performance
detector = GarbleDetector(Strategy.MARKOV_CHAIN)
detector.predict("the quick brown fox") # False
detector.predict("xkqzjwpmv") # True
# High precision - zero false positives
detector = GarbleDetector(Strategy.BIGRAM_PROBABILITY)
detector.predict("hello world") # False
detector.predict("qxjjxz") # True (impossible: qx, jj, xz)
# Encoding corruption detection
detector = GarbleDetector(Strategy.MOJIBAKE)
detector.predict("Café") # False - valid UTF-8
detector.predict("Café") # True - mojibake
# Homoglyph attack detection
detector = GarbleDetector(Strategy.UNICODE_SCRIPT)
detector.predict("paypal") # False - all Latin
detector.predict("pаypal") # True - Cyrillic 'а'
Combine multiple strategies for better accuracy:
from pygarble import EnsembleDetector, Strategy
# Default ensemble (recommended)
# Uses: MARKOV_CHAIN, LOG_LIKELIHOOD_RATIO, WORD_ANOMALY
# Voting: "any" - the two companions had zero benchmark false positives,
# so they only add recall on top of MARKOV_CHAIN
detector = EnsembleDetector()
# Custom strategies
detector = EnsembleDetector(
strategies=[
Strategy.MARKOV_CHAIN,
Strategy.BIGRAM_PROBABILITY,
Strategy.KEYBOARD_PATTERN,
]
)
# Different voting modes (default: "any" for the built-in strategy set,
# "majority" when you pass a custom strategies list)
detector = EnsembleDetector(voting="any") # High recall - flag if ANY strategy detects
detector = EnsembleDetector(voting="all") # High precision - flag only if ALL agree
detector = EnsembleDetector(voting="majority") # Balanced
detector = EnsembleDetector(voting="average") # Average probabilities
# Weighted voting
detector = EnsembleDetector(
strategies=[Strategy.MARKOV_CHAIN, Strategy.WORD_LOOKUP],
voting="weighted",
weights=[0.7, 0.3]
)
GarbleDetector(
strategy: Strategy,
threshold: float = 0.5, # Probability threshold for predict()
**kwargs # Strategy-specific parameters
)
# Methods
detector.predict(text) # Returns bool or List[bool]
detector.predict_proba(text) # Returns float or List[float] (0.0-1.0)
EnsembleDetector(
strategies: List[Strategy] = None, # Default: MARKOV_CHAIN + LLR + WORD_ANOMALY
threshold: float = 0.5,
voting: str = None, # "majority", "any", "all", "average", "weighted"
# default: "any" (built-in set) / "majority" (custom set)
weights: List[float] = None, # Required if voting="weighted"
)
# Methods (same as GarbleDetector)
detector.predict(text)
detector.predict_proba(text)
detector = EnsembleDetector()
def validate_input(text):
if detector.predict(text):
return "Please enter valid text"
return None
detector = GarbleDetector(Strategy.MARKOV_CHAIN)
clean_data = [text for text in raw_data if not detector.predict(text)]
detector = GarbleDetector(Strategy.MOJIBAKE)
for text in documents:
if detector.predict(text):
print(f"Encoding issue detected: {text[:50]}...")
detector = GarbleDetector(Strategy.UNICODE_SCRIPT)
if detector.predict(domain_name):
print("Warning: Possible homoglyph attack")
git clone https://github.com/brightertiger/pygarble.git
cd pygarble
pip install -e ".[dev]"
pytest tests/ -v
MIT License
spellchecker extra)| New default ensemble: MARKOV_CHAIN | LOG_LIKELIHOOD_RATIO | WORD_ANOMALY with voting="any" (99.2% precision, 85.6% recall - strictly dominates any single strategy) |
voting now defaults to “any” for the built-in strategy set, “majority” for custom sets